Cancer is the biggest cause of mortality globally, with 19.3 million new cases and over 10 million deaths expected in 2020. By 2040, the worldwide cancer burden is predicted to reach 28.4 million cases. Female breast cancer is the most often diagnosed type of cancer, followed by lung, colorectal, prostate, and stomach cancers. By enrolling in clinical trials, patients can gain early access to potentially life-saving medicines and help bring innovative treatments to more patients in the future. Even though the COVID-19 pandemic has interrupted many clinical trials, including cancer trials, the clinical demand is substantial. Moreover, clinical studies are resuming their normal pace following the introduction of several mitigating measures. Of course, there are ample hurdles in Clinical Development and this articles addresses the Challenges In Early Phase Oncology Trials
Various patient-related misunderstandings and impediments might surround early-stage clinical trials. After overcoming the initial barrier of educating a patient about the possibility of participating in a study, other obstacles arise.
To begin, some patients may be fearful of being prescribed a medication with a short track record or a placebo. Others may skip early phase studies out of concern that their health may deteriorate or that they would experience adverse consequences. On the other hand, oncology medicines that get to early phase clinical trials have been evaluated in vivo or earlier studies, ensuring that patient safety is prioritized. You must adequately advise each patient about the advantages and hazards of enrollment in an early phase clinical study. The entire team will require sufficient time and resources to discuss study details with prospective patients.
Patients frequently raise similar questions during cancer studies at BIO1 as they do in other clinical trials:
- Is the experimental product considered to be safe?
- What if the medication is ineffective?
- Or if it results in adverse events that necessitate the trial’s termination?
- How frequently are study visits scheduled?
- What other procedures will be carried out throughout the trial?
- What therapy alternatives are available upon withdrawal from the trial? Will I be allowed to continue therapy if a beneficial outcome occurs?
Our skilful investigator-oncologists provide adequate time and effort to address any potential subject inquiries and ease any worries or concerns.
Participating in any clinical study, particularly an early phase clinical trial, may impose logistical burdens on participants.
Travel to the clinical trial location, many visits, rigorous schedules, painful procedure scheduling, and overnight stays might feel like an extra hardship, particularly for oncologic patients.
Patients may be unaware of payment options such as travel fees, meals, and even money for their time. Therefore, we advise sponsors to factor this into their clinical trial budget planning and ensure that everything these aspects are covered in advance.
We develop and submit to regulatory authorities a supplementary Agreement on Subject Reimbursement in addition to the Informed Consent Form at our early phase unit BIO1. This Agreement has a thorough pay plan, including reimbursement for time worked, travel, food, and contraceptive expenditures and reimbursement for other applicable expenses.
Thus, we hope to alleviate any needless concerns for the patient, allowing them to set logistical concerns aside and consider the potential advantages to their health when deciding whether to participate.
There are a variety of probable explanations for sluggish enrollment in early phase cancer studies. However, Phase I research’s most often cited reasons include safety concerns, design difficulties, and tight eligibility requirements.
To guarantee that you accomplish your trial’s objectives, you must address several factors while designing the study, including establishing the enrollment criteria, arranging the appropriate dosage escalation schedule, and developing the safety management strategy. However, a phase I site and study staff can assist the Sponsor in meeting enrolment timelines in the following ways:
- Allow sufficient time to inform patients and family members prior to the informed consent procedure. Then, let patients to take written patient information home with them.
- Reduce logistical difficulties for patients by compensating them for any out-of-pocket expenditures and time spent during clinical trial visits;
- Assure a quiet atmosphere – it’s enormously beneficial to conduct a clinical study in a designated phase 1 unit away from hundreds of other patients, particularly for oncological patients who are exhausted from recurrent hospital visits. Patients at BIO1, report that they frequently experience relaxation during their visits.
- Ensure that you keep the administrative load on investigators to a minimum. An investigator is more motivated and eager to enrol another clinical trial subject if their primary focus is on the patient’s medical treatment instead of administrative chores. You can easily delegate these mundane tasks to other experienced team members.
- You can contact and exchange information with colleagues or patient advocacy organizations. By increasing knowledge of the ongoing clinical study, you can increase the likelihood of direct referrals.
Cumbersome administrative procedures and staffing requirements (research nurses, supporting staff) can severely hamper early phase studies.
A site must have adequate people, equipment, and facilities to participate in an early phase study. Early phase studies frequently involve many treatments not included in regular therapy (intensive pharmacokinetics sampling, multiple ECGs, vital signs monitoring, repeated imaging tests, etc.).
As a result, clinical trial staff must be well trained and capable of devoting their full attention and time to the study’s conduct. The site may become swamped with administrative tasks, resulting in poor recruiting. At our BIO1 Early Phase Unit, we have specialized personnel to assist scientists with administrative chores, allowing them to concentrate on subject recruitment and medical care. Experiential study coordinators and study nurses manage all study-related duties, including the following:
- study procedures (vitals signs, electrocardiograms, blood and urine sampling, also multiple samples for pharmacokinetics);
- entries into eCRF;
- investigational product accountability;
- preparation and dosing;
- temperature monitoring;
- visit tracking;
- and many other tasks.
Any oncological medication is intended to prolong patients’ overall survival or to improve their quality of life. Overall survival is a straightforward metric to evaluate and understand as the primary endpoint in many late-phase cancer clinical studies. Often, progression-free survival serves as a surrogate endpoint for effectiveness, not just in phase III studies but also in phase II trials.
Biomarker-driven surrogate endpoints can be incorporated prospectively in early-phase oncology clinical trials to assess the mechanism of action and biological response to immune-oncological therapies. In addition, surrogate endpoints can be quantified considerably sooner, allowing for the following:
- Shorter follow up time;
- A smaller sample size;
- Reduced overall costs;
- And accelerated approval of your drug.
However, it would be best if you used surrogate endpoints with caution. Surrogate endpoints may not necessarily reflect the efficacy of the drug with regard to actual outcomes. Therefore inappropriate decisions for future development phases can be made, resulting in failed trials. The solution is to effectively use surrogate endpoints and a high level of expertise at the early stages of a new oncology drug development.
- Sung, H, Ferlay, J, Siegel, RL, Laversanne, M, Soerjomataram, I, Jemal, A, Bray, F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021: 71: 209- 249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
- Holly A. Massett, Grace Mishkin, Larry Rubinstein, S. Percy Ivy, Andrea Denicoff, Elizabeth Godwin, Kate DiPiazza, Jennifer Bolognese, James A. Zwiebel and Jeffrey S. Abrams. Challenges Facing Early Phase Trials Sponsored by the National Cancer Institute: An Analysis of Corrective Action Plans to Improve Accrual. Clin Cancer Res November 15 2016 (22) (22) 5408-5416; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0338
The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of decentralized clinical trials by emphasizing the tangible advantages of virtual trials and their ability to improve the patient and physician experience. Moreover, it requires stakeholders to devote time and...
The EU CTR is the new Regulation that govers all interventional clinical trials using human medicinal products. By implementing this Clinical Trials Regulation (CTR) early 2022, the European Commission hopes to establish a better environment for clinical trials in the...
August 2021 Ola Jeppsson has taken on a leading role as Business Development Director. In addition to his new role, he was appointed as a Chief Executive Officer at Biomapas Nordic AB starting August 2021.Having a management and business development background in the...
Choosing the right set of countries, sites and investigators for a clinical trial are critical success factors in any clinical development program. They can guarantee speedy patient recruitment and timely delivery of study results. It also ensures that you conduct...
This article reviews Clinical Study Start-up Differences Between West & East Europe, timelines, and processes. Medicine is constantly evolving to invent effective ways to treat diseases. This progress is a never-ending process: the life science industry develops...
Despite the fact that Ukraine is the largest country in Eastern Europe with a large population of treatment-naïve patients, well organized public health care sector and significant number of medical sites accredited for clinical trial conduction, country has utilized only 15% of its current potential for hosting clinical trials. During 2017, the European Medicine Agency (EMA) gave positive recommendations on 94 new drug applications and 49 of them were tested in clinical trials in Ukraine. During the same year, the US FDA approved 151 new drugs, and 28 of them were also studied in Ukraine.
Russia is a very perspective country for international clinical trial conduction. The first international clinical trial was set up in Russia about 20 years ago only, and from than country kept a great potential for market development. In 2018 health authorities (HAs) approved 653 clinical trials (CT) in Russian Federation, less in overall numbers compared to the same indicator from 2016 – 898 approved CTs. However, this decrease was observed across all types of clinical trials except for international multicentre clinical trials (IMCT).
The number of clinical trials worldwide is increasing more than 10% each year due to the new diseases, further research for better health products and development of new drugs. Though, for a successful clinical trial, there is a major challenge – patient recruitment, which is essential and the most challenging factor due to the increasing number of new clinical trials. In order to achieve the required patient recruitment, sponsors are looking for different solutions.
In the past five years, an average of 175 clinical trials are being initiated in the Baltic states each year. An average of 64,8% of the population in the Baltic states are in the age from 15 to 65 years old, the main target audience for clinical trials. Furthermore, a large pool of treatment-naïve subjects is available compared to other EU countries or the US. Patients with special therapeutic diseases are transferred to the main central hospitals.
On 29th March 2017 UK submitted the notification of its intention to withdraw from the EU. This means that UK will become a ‘third country’ from 30th March’19. Even though leaving the EU with a deal remains the Government’s top priority, UK drug agency is publishing a series of guidance documents for industry and other stakeholders covering the proposed arrangements for the regulation of medicines, medical devices and clinical trials, if UK leaves EU with no deal.